The recent media coverage around Vice President Kamala Harris highlights an ongoing debate about her role and how she is portrayed in the context of the Biden administration.
Politico and other outlets have faced criticism for their portrayal of Harris in relation to President Biden’s administration. Politico raised concerns about Republican attempts to tie Harris closely to Biden’s record, while the Washington Post noted that many Americans don’t view her as central to the administration’s agenda.
The Associated Press reported on Harris’ dual role as both an incumbent vice president and a change candidate, suggesting she is balancing two competing messages. This characterization has been met with mixed reactions, including frustration from some political commentators.
In contrast, Axios and MSNBC have faced backlash for their reporting on Harris’ role as the “border czar,” a title she was never officially given but was widely used by critics. The term has been a point of contention, with some media outlets now rejecting the label and clarifying past inaccuracies.
The media’s shifting portrayal of Harris reflects broader discussions about her effectiveness and her role in the Biden administration. As she campaigns for higher office, her dual role and the narratives surrounding it continue to evolve.
